|
The Girl’s King Arthur: Tales of the
Women of Camelot
By Barbara Tepa Lupack, illustrated by
Ian Brown. Dallas, TX: Scriptorium Press, 2010. 178 pp.
Reviewed by Renee Ward
(Wilfred Laurier
University, Ontario)
Barbara Tepa Lupack’s The Girl’s
King Arthur is a collection of original retellings of the stories of eight
women of the Arthurian tradition: Guinevere, Elaine of Astolat, Elayne of
Carbonek, La Belle Iseult, Dame Ragnell, Vivien, Lynette, and Morgan le Fay.
The collection (which pays homage to Malory’s original The Whole Book of
King Arthur and of His Noble Knights of the Round Table in its division
into eight tales) is framed by a Prologue and Epilogue, both of which are
narrated by the Lady of the Lake. Each of the tales begins in the first-person
perspective of its female namesake. Through its approach, the volume seeks to
redress the tradition of many medieval documents and narratives in which women
appear, in the words of Lisa M. Bitel (Women in Medieval Europe 400-1100),
mostly “as shadows marked only by affiliation to individual men” (1). These are
the stories of the women of Camelot, told by the women of Camelot. The tales
are also reflective; they frequently refer back to each other, inviting
comparisons between the stories that have already been told and the one about
to begin. Further, the volume includes a series of black and white
illustrations by Ian Brown, simple in design and evocative of the
fifteenth-century woodcut illustrations often employed by William Caxton. The
illustrations appear at the start of each tale and depict each tale’s
protagonist. Like the reflective openings, the illustrations invite comparison
because they highlight the character in a situation that reflects a well-known
aspect of her story. Overall, the volume highlights a number of key themes,
including female desire and autonomy, the clash between loyalties (especially
those which arise when the desires of the heart conflict with social or
political duties), and female knowledge or learning. These themes, while connected
to tales of medieval women, remain relevant to modern women and girls and will
resonate with female readers. As a teaching tool, the volume could be useful
for both parents and educators, most effectively if tempered with some
additional resources on the lives and practices of women in the late Middle
Ages. As entertainment, it will appeal to both male and female readers,
regardless of age, despite the suggestively gendered title.
While the Lady of the Lake declares, in
her Prologue, that the stories “are not the familiar ones, of tournaments and
quests” (3), most readers will not be entirely unfamiliar with the volume’s
contents. Most of the tales derive from the later Arthurian romance tradition
rather than the earlier chronicle accounts, and depict, overall, a world in
which treachery and strife are rampant among the Knights of the Round Table.
The Prologue, for example, recounts Arthur’s origins and rise to power, and
draws heavily upon the ‘sword in the stone’ tradition that first surfaced in Robert
de Boron’s Merlin and was popularized in the twentieth century by T. H.
White and Disney. Similarly, the first full tale - - which is also the longest
tale in the volume - - focuses on the love triangle between Arthur, Guinevere,
and Lancelot, which was originally introduced in the twelfth century by
Chrétien de Troyes and is, perhaps, the most famous feature of the Arthurian
tradition.
The book jacket describes the
collection as a “nontraditional perspective” that emphasizes “female
achievement” and “paint[s] an exciting new picture of the Arthurian world - - a
world of magic, both black and white; of loyalties, both binding and broken;
and of dreams, both frustrated and fulfilled.” The stories do, indeed,
emphasize the achievements of their namesakes, from the knowledge of Viven, who
studies under and overpowers Merlin, to the wisdom of Lynette, who teaches
Beaumains the power of mercy; they also emphasize the conflicts of desire and
obligation that many medieval women experienced. In fact, this is the volume’s
greatest strength: it provides insight into the political and social
obligations of medieval women, particularly those of the aristocratic class.
“The Tale of Guinevere” and “The Tale of La Belle Iseult” highlight how often
political and social obligations conflict with the desires of the heart. Both
Guinevere and Iseult must marry kings even though they love other men, Lancelot
and Tristram, respectively. Their tales articulate the difficulties each woman
faces as she grapples with conflicting emotions and responsibilities, and
emphasize that happiness or contentment can only be achieved once she is true
to herself.
Guinevere’s story also emphasizes a
number of female achievements and difficulties that are often absent from
medieval texts, especially the administrative challenges and physical isolation
frequently faced by women of the noble class. During periods of war or crusade,
men could be absent for extended periods, leaving their wives to manage
households and estates on their own. Guinevere describes such a life, telling
the reader, when her husband “resumed his battles . . . my sense of solitude
grew more intense. Arthur would leave for weeks or months at a time . . . yet
sent no word to me concerning his welfare” (28). While the King is absent, the
Queen manages his kingdom effectively, efficiently, but she is, for all her
female companions, lonely. Guinevere’s frustration with this lifestyle is
exacerbated by Arthur’s lack of acknowledgement, upon his return, of how well
she has ministered the kingdom, and by his reluctance to seek her counsel “on
any official matters of state” (29). Here, her story reflects the common
medieval belief that women were understood as helpers rather than as equals,
and the reality that they were frequently excluded from positions of power
within patriarchal societies.
The theme of female desire introduced
in Guinevere’s narrative permeates the volume and is the primary focus of “The
Tale of Ragnell.” This tale, which blends narrative elements of the beheading
game and the loathly lady traditions (following the Middle English The
Wedding of Sir Gawain and Dame Ragnell and echoing Chaucer’s The Wife of
Bath’s Tale), suggests that only through mutual respect can love truly
blossom. Gawain’s willingness to honour his wife’s decisions - - to put her
desires before his own - - releases Dame Ragnell from the enchantment placed
upon her by her evil brother and allows her marriage “to be solid and lasting”
(119), to become a partnership rather than a hierarchy. The link between
happiness and self-empowerment is also the closing message of the volume. In
the Epilogue, the Lady of the Lake tells her readers, “Take charge of your
destiny: write your own legacy, and ensure that your legend endures” (171). She
implores her readers to pursue their dreams, to embrace their desires - - as
the women in the volume have done - - and to help shape society through the
skills, knowledge, and wisdom which they possess.
The volume also provides insight into
the lives of medieval women beyond matrimonial duties and affairs of the heart.
Several tales highlight the access to education women of the noble class
frequently had, especially if they entered a cloister, as well as the types of
learning commonly available to them. “The Tale of Morgan le Fay,” for instance,
elucidates both the positive and negative aspects of life in the cloister, a
lifestyle many medieval women experienced, often not by choice. During her time
in the convent, Morgan participates in tasks likewise completed by women within
the secular world, such as meal preparation and maintenance of the herb and
vegetable gardens. Yet she also has access to education, to learning “in the
arts and in languages, especially Latin” (156), which, she confesses, she
“truly enjoyed” (156). The pleasure of learning, however, is not enough to
assuage the isolation Morgan feels while living within the cloister, an
isolation which parallels that of Guinevere. Both women, despite their
different circumstances, desire companionship and warmth in their daily
activities, whether these are intellectual pursuits or the tasks associated
with housewifery.
Iseult’s story, like Morgan’s,
demonstrates connections between women and learning, and reveals how women
could be revered for their knowledge, especially in the areas most frequently
associated with folkloric and magical knowledge: herblore and healing. The tale
has numerous, detailed passages, such as the one provided by Iseult when she
first encounters and heals the wounded Tristram:
With a paste of dittany and black soap,
I extracted what was left of the poison from the spear tip. With poultices of
hot barley and fennel, I encountered the infection. With cabbage leaves, I
dressed the cut. And with a mixture of betany and vervain, I calmed him and helped
him sleep. (88)
This description reflects some basic
medieval techniques in healing, especially the practice that became, as Nancy
G. Siraisi suggests in Medieval and Early Renaissance Medicine, the
“foundation of medieval European pharmacy” (141), that of utilizing compounds
based on herbal medicines comprised of a limited number of ingredients. The
tale also highlights the possibility that while typically excluded from the
professional healing arts, many women participated in midwifery and traditional
healing activities within their communities. Iseult is not a professional
physician or surgeon; rather, she is skilled local healer whose knowledge
resides in herblore.
Yet the tales also emphasize the
negative association of female healing with magic, the barriers to classical or
traditional learning (a pursuit more commonly linked to men), and the dangers
women with knowlege frequently faced. Iseult’s description of her medical
treatments highlights the common medieval in the magical properties of many
plants and herbs. Vervain (verbena officinalis), for instance, was
reputed for its magical qualities and compounds abounded in which vervain was
present, for it was believed to remedy a wide-range of ailments. In “The Tale
of Vivien,” the protagonist desires both traditional and magical knowledge and
pursues a relationship with Merlin in hopes of increasing her skills. Yet even
Merlin suggests that her desire is unnatural; he tells her that she has “lofty
ambitions for a woman” (129) and he thwarts her learning by limiting his
instruction to only those items he deems are appropriate for a woman. While
Vivien ultimately overcomes her tutor, gains knowledge, and finds happiness and
freedom in her craft, it is not without a price. During her time at Camelot she
becomes isolated, outcast from the other women of the court, because her
desires and ambitions transgress social norms. Morgan’s story similarly
highlights how women with knowledge could be feared and reviled. While at
Camelot, she comes under suspicion when Guinevere receives a poisoned mantle.
Arthur banishes her from the court, and she criticizes him for assuming that a
woman with knowledge would use that knowledge for her own advancement or for
ill-purposes. “You assume,” she states, “because I am an intelligent woman,
schooled in languages and reading, that I am some kind of sorceress—that
my learning is automatically magical in nature, and that I will somehow use
that knowledge for evil purposes or for my own advancement” (161). Her speech
emphasizes how quickly women with learning could be understood as witches or
sorceresses, precisely because they possessed knowledge beyond that of their
peers or of men.
Knowledge of the Arthurian tradition is
not necessary for one to enjoy this volume, although there are numerous
instances in which the terminology might be unfamiliar to readers without a
background in the Middle Ages or Arthurian literature. Fortunately, Lupack
provides an extensive glossary in the back of the book to help readers with
this material. The entries in the glossary range from the names of herbs that
might be uncommon to readers - - such as heartsease, “a wild pansy
flower,” and pellitory, “an herb of the nettle family, with alternate
leaves and inconspicuous flowers” - - to culinary terms - - such as galentine,
“a kind of sauce for fish or fowl; also a dish made of sopped bread and
spices,” and sorengue, “a method for preparing eel in vinegar and
spices” (174-76). Lupack maintains a degree of historiocity through language
but does so without making the material unaccessable to a younger or less
specialized audience.
Parents and educators might wish to
supplement the readings with contextual material on medieval society and the
roles of women in the Middle Ages. As mentioned above, most of the volume
focuses on a limited portion of medieval society, the aristocratic class, and
in doing so presents a narrow view of the Middle Ages, especially of the lives
of medieval women. This limited perspective does not illuminate the realities
which many, if not most, medieval women faced. Peasant women faced lives of
physical and economic hardship, and laboured extensively in the fields even
though such work was considered unfit and demeaning for the female gender. The
narratives also do not evoke the fragility of existence many women (and men)
experienced in this period. As Bitel suggests, “mortality rates” and “low life
expectancies” were not uncommon: “Daily survival was never a sure thing for any
woman in medieval Europe, whatever her age or station” (11).
Another drawback to the volume is that
the narratives frequently digress into lengthy accounts of the exploits of
Arthur and his knights, ultimately drawing the reader’s attention away from the
female characters. For tales that are meant to focus on “female achievement,”
as the Lady of the Lake declares, a number of the narratives ultimately revolve
around the male characters. “The Tale of Lynette,” for instance, while it
highlights the female protagonist’s wisdom and mercy, is still, primarily, a
retelling of the tale of Beaumains, of his rough treatment at the hands of Sir
Kay while at Camelot, and of his quest to free Lady Lyonors. Further, while the
tales typically start in a first-person perspective, many of them quickly slide
into a third-person omniscient voice that detracts from the intended focus on
the female “I” of the narrative and, instead, refocuses the reader’s attention
on the storylines concerning the male characters. This feature, however, has
the potential to widen the readership of the volume. Although described as a
text for readers “10 and up,” and thereby not specifying a gendered audience,
the book’s title and intended perspective, of course, suggests that the target
audience is female. The pervasive focus on male characters and their key roles
in each of the narratives will no doubt appeal to all readers, male or female.
Finally, as a general note, the print is quite small. For a volume clearly
aimed at a younger audience, it might have been better, to aid reading, to have
a slightly larger font and an increased page count.
Renee Ward received her PhD from the
University of Alberta, where she specialized in late medieval literature and
modern medievalism. Her research interests include liminal figures, from
shape-shifters to warrior women, medieval romance, and modern fantasy
literature. She is currently a visiting Assistant Professor at Wilfred Laurier
University in Ontario, Canada.
The Once and Future Classroom , Volume
VIII, Issue 2, Fall 2010
http://www.teamsmedieval.org/ |